03 03 2014
The banking industry has seen a rise in consumer confidence for two years in a row, according to a new survey of 32,000 banking customers in 43 countries. The study around the world showed confidence increasing most in India, followed by Saudi Arabia, with confidence falling the most in Ireland and Spain.The survey showed 60% of respondents aren’t planning to close or move their accounts, which, according to Ernst & Young highlights that this isn’t necessarily because they are confident that they are with the right provider, with some respondents stating they a change would be too difficult or time consuming.
“Bank customers are not being actively retained; they simply remain with their current provider through inertia and are therefore vulnerable to competitors“.
According to another global study the Arts, Entertainment and Hobbies market sector was 60% more competitive January 2014 compared to January 2013 and Financial Services 60% more so, whilst Sports & Recreation was 121% less competitive in January 2014 compared to 2013 in relation to digital advertising
The three months to February saw a highest level since 1998, in the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) quarterly Service Sector Survey. Optimism indices for consumer services (including hotels, bars, restaurants and leisure) rose to their highest level amongst 139 companies and at the quickest pace since 2005.
The ONS has confirmed the UK economy grew by 0.7% in the Quarter with business investment rising by 2.4% from the previous three-month period and rose 8.5% from a year earlier.
The BBA (British Bankers Association) has said that mortgage lending was 38% higher in January than a year ago and ‘continues to rise compared to a year earlier’. It is widely expected that the Bank of England will raise interest rates by the end of next year, with an inevitable knock-on effect on mortgage rates.
Finally, not certain if this is a record or not but Royal Bank of Scotland has lost all the money invested in it by the taxpayer six years ago with total losses since its bailout now drawn level with the £46bn put in with 81% stake, in 2008 and The Co-op Group’s losses for 2013 are expected to be greater than £2bn, by far the worst in its history.
Image and Article credits: Copyright SUF 2014 ©
03 02 2014
April sees the MMR (Mortgage Market Review) come into force including waves of change around affordability rules. Those lenders who haven’t already implemented increased affordability checks will do so, as part of applicant stress testing and scrutiny.
Claims made for tax relief on plant and fixtures within property using capital gains, will alter after 1 April 2014 where allowances have been included in a Fixed Value Requirement or Disposal Value Statement.
Finance Bill 2014
From draft legislation there will be changes to the taxation of partnerships and pension tax relief additionally, (not yet published) capital gains tax on the disposal of certain properties by non-residents.
NHBC Standards are changing rules relating to ventilation and heat recovery, fireplaces and chimneys, with design life of timber retaining walls being part of clarifying technical requirements.
LFB (London Fire Brigade) is to charge businesses £290 for call-outs if they attend more than 10 false alarms in a 12 month period in response to a vast amount of wasted time spent attending triggered automatic fire alarm systems.
(No connection to business or finance whatsoever) Simply Interesting for some
F1 will see V6 Turbo engines instead of the 2.4 litre V8s – engine recovery is going to the rear wheels where there will be harder compound tyres of lower nosed, heavier, single exhaust cars .
Image and Article credit: Copyright SUF 2014 ©
Pollex’s Up! Time Thief
Where is the human Pollex situated?
First day away from the office and, blessed crackers, I was exposed as a lazy thinker… I’d have to Google that one… I had no idea
Thinking takes practice - When it comes to cramming certain facts, I’ve never managed to hold the map of routes that circumnavigate burning midnight oil. Although even if I’d realised that higher intelligence (and by that I’m not referring to myself) isn’t insurance against the necessity of putting in practice, I’d still have skipped school in favour of seeing Bowie live. By the time I was a parent I hadn’t even given a thought to parenting needing practice so, as a naive parent, ‘kinaesthetic learner’ was welcomed as enthusiastically as child given a puppy for Christmas and now, thanks to the Great God that is Google we’re all one click away from information overload …. and exposure to more lazy thinking.
Why bother problem solving by exploring ideas when there’s so much ‘knowledge’ readily available? - In business I’m sometimes as guilty as the next in giving out (accompanied by involuntarily inside mouth biting) ‘well… it depends’. The reason is (usually) simple: something is beyond my control; I have to surrender to an, in effect, legion of androgynous troopers, who waiting on the doorstep – ‘outside forces’. For as frustrating as it can be (for all parties), I can’t always give a definitive black and white determination. But, just as I’ve experienced sufficient to realise that time is of the essence in business, I’ve also come to recognise, you’re going to have a hard time if a job isn’t done properly. Hence, I have a more frustrating time when a person emits (often with side of the mouth chew to infer they’re giving thought), ‘well… it depends’ as their camouflage for sitting on the fence – time wasting.
Ground control to Major Tom… Can you hear me Major Tom?
Sometimes it does depend.
Without balanced thinking, pros and cons are useless - Take marketing for example. As each trend, strategy, plan, and measurement, expands, increases, decreases, the general shift becomes, as with each element of a business’s evolution, more complex; especially when (like you and me) the customer factored in to the ROI is increasingly savvier in using online search for information, solutions and comparison. Then take what is now an elemental marketing platform, the website. Every business owner will have their own opinion about the notion that a business without a website is said to be non-existent. A website for some is easy entry into marketing, for others it can be too difficult to even consider, different perspectives, both derived from a ‘thinking’ process relevant to itself. However, the value judgement of ‘thinking’ resides in the overview, which is measured by considering the positive points of having a website and the negative points, or lesser positive. When something hasn’t been tried before, or experience tells of mistakes, messy experience, or similar, the ‘thinking’ balanced viewpoint might go along the lines of ‘it might be worthy of more information for further consideration’.
When thinking isn’t practiced surely it goes the way of any unpractised skill, meaning it can’t be put into operation from experience. Using the analogy of the well-practiced acrobat with an ability to rotate many hula hoops, all at once, quickly enough to make the hoops look as one – that’s what a Venn diagram of the scope of my service business’s crossovers would look like (elements overlapping one another, plus elements overlapping with other service businesses) - just as other business owners’ Venns will have overlaps for how and what they operate. I don’t know about you, but for me it’s difficult to want to only direct my attention to the interesting bits of my business. The way I try to manage this tendency (and maintain direction) is to think about the decisions I have to make …. and make those decisions. And, as I don’t like to limit my thinking, the information I need mustn’t be limited or biased….
The point is, it’s not only the information that’s important. We all want a derivative black and white determination AND at the same time choice, alternatives to consider. The route of least resistance means that we don’t get distracted, decisions can be made quickly, time won’t run away further than it already has. Searching amongst constraints to find hidden, unobvious, possibility and informed decision making takes thinking about (time) which (as the inside of my cheek will attest), on the occasions of forces being beyond my control, can be frustrating - But as, in my experience, confident responses aren’t guarantee of certainty. Saying ‘well…. it depends’ can, depending on where you sit, be fence-sitting or thinking beyond the most likely.
“You ask yourself not if this or that is expedient, but if it is right” – Alan Paton
Image credits: Celestine Chua, Kevin K, Marc Dalmulder, Jin.
Article credit: Copyright SUF 2014©
02 01 2014
The month of predictions is here… so while we get down to business…. here’s a roundup of what’s being said…
Disrupting Business – The Guardian
Interest Rates - FT.com
Manufacturing – BBC.co.uk
Opportunity – Express
Food – Independent
Housing – ibtimes.co.uk
UK Economy - BBC.co.uk
Image and Article credit: Copyright SUF 2014 ©
Businesses Break Up All The Time - Not Always for The Right Reasons
There are some get-togethers of which I’m partial to.
But, unless the invitation is from nearest and dearest, sometimes there can be a palaver of what bottle to take (are these folks wine buffs…?). For those I know better I’m usually safe in the knowledge that providing the label looks interesting, never mind the contents (don’t judge me) and, therefore the opportunity to reconnect at a family gathering is usually safer ground….. Auntie Sue can always be relied on to admonish Uncle Joe for one-too-many beers (in her unique one-too-many wines way)…. and there’s always a younger family member providing general distracting entertainment in demonstrating the latest `how to wriggle away’ from Auntie Sue’s lipstick enhanced hugs.
Over time there’s been a noticeable change synonymous with some gatherings.
There seems to have been less proud moments of proffering re-introduction to offspring last seen in a pushchair and now sporting full exhibit for Movember, and more (when enquiring about other halves) looking to the floor, feet shuffling and announcing ‘…. we’re separated/separating’. Any awkward moments of bringing the wrong bottle or giving flowers to an allergy sufferer are insignificant by comparison to these cues.
A breakdown isn’t always obvious.
Much the same process as a business’s breakdown, when connections no longer work, visible signs aren’t automatically noticeable. Broken connections in long-term life relationships have a commonality with businesses breaking down, easily going unnoticed amongst other pressures, communication is the first to be let go of. Only last week I spoke with a business manager who hasn’t seen the businesses owner on the premises for over two years! With no obvious reason, the manager concluded (and I agree) the ‘relationship’ between owner and business was over (also manifesting as ‘relationship’ with owner and staff straining at the seams).
It’s a shock.
Any business owner drifting away from a ‘relationship’ with their business is like leaving a baby unattended – in short, risk is left unmanaged. A symptom of realisation is anger. And, just as someone might be prepared to spend time looking at the situation, the ball has started rolling. They might be ready to take action but quicker than expected, third parties have entered. Realisation’s anger is fuelled by a compounding realisation of the reduction in informed decision making prospects. Adding frustration fuel to anger, the unwanted third party intervention is necessary as damage limitation, both parties want to take decisions but the anger often gives out confusing and conflicting information. With increased animosity…. a vicious circle starts, to which the only benefactor is ironically all too often the cause: Wasted time.
Is the end is inevitable?
With compromises, adjustments have in their core unsettling processes; some people come through their experience tired, others stronger. Much as looking to the floor, feet shuffling and announcing ‘…. we’re separated/separating’ can be followed by pointing to a baby covered in lipstick kisses ‘and that’s our new offspring!’ The business owner might be re-affirmed that being an employee isn’t an option.
Mitigating the blow.
We’ve all had shocks of one form or another which in hindsight can sound easier to have come through than it actually was. But, by acting upon the realisation of something not working, the blow can be lessened, leaving time for revival. A conclusion usually starts with re-evaluation (and wound licking) – No matter how awful the realisation is that either a relationship within a business is breaking down, or that the relationship with a business is breaking down, the sooner it is acted upon the sooner the effects can be mitigated.
Carry on or act upon the realisation.
Connections in the breakdown of long-term life relationships have a commonality with businesses breaking down.
Image credit: NinaZed Article credit: Copyright SUF © 2013
02 12 2013
To sustain or grow business, owners need to continually invest; However, 2013 has maintained a vein of general turbulence for business… with a finale to the year (unless something else turns up before Big Ben’s midnight striking in the New Year….) on the heels of the Co-Op’s disgraced former Chairman’s scandal, culminating in RBS being accused of deliberately wrecking viable small businesses to make profit.
My concern has always been for those businesses that were indulged by their banks, like spoilt children at a party; overeating and over-excited to the point of bursting. Then, needing support, (often feeling sick) they’d return to the bank for assistance – Only to find themselves overlooked and thrown out of the ‘house’. Good viable businesses and so-called zombie business equally hit – Any who have spoken with me over the last decade will know that the RBS story is very old news. And now, earlier than the 2018 target, the Bank of England has been asked to review its powers over the banks’ balance sheets – the Leverage Ratio – to rein in risk-taking banks.
With access to finance via traditional bank funding still having barriers, businesses have done well to keep their heads above water. So will the 2014 opening of The British Business Bank offer some innovation as an institution? Or will dependence on its infrastructure Velcro it to the various other Government initiatives which have had little impact in their contribution to accessing working capital or asset purchase?
2014 will be interesting to watch as a juncture to continued ‘extreme’ risk aversion. The Banking Reform Bill (in the House of Lords) with its measurements to ‘improve’ bank governance is to come into effect. One element proposed to enter the Bill is the criminal offence of ‘reckless misconduct in the management of a bank’ (should a senior banker’s behaviour fall below that which could be ‘reasonably expected’). That could be an interesting one – We all run our businesses in the belief that we’re doing the right thing at the time (to run our businesses) and, banks being businesses will probably counter the same argument. Which, considering the few spot-the-differences in the 5+ years since the financial carnage, there’s probably plenty of time for those at high levels to haul this one around before any movement is seen in the management culture of those lofty level bankers.
Analysis Paralysis 2014?
Image and Article credit: Copyright SUF © 2013
Once-Upon-A-Time (in the real past) a Builder Developer was in the middle of developing an industrial estate when he came stuck (Historical note: *even in pre-recession days, High Street Banks changed lending rules as deftly as the Academy of Dark Arts). Having cast comfort blanket salaries aside, he and I both were in the early stages of a long crawl into business (Spoiler Alert: this is more a Grimm traditional tale in that there’s no happily ever after).
Being on a razor’s edge, walking through barbed wire, and treading on eggshells are some of the graphic observations I hear from Business Owners about running their businesses (in the good times, and during bad times). Pressure Points are constantly put to the test and when responsibilities intensify; Being a core business element, the finances that fund those responsibilities inevitably can be as sensitive as would any vulnerable area that is subject to sharp objects.
I was to assist Mr D by searching out alternative avenues…… whilst he was out of the country…. But, as is often the way for the Business Goldmine Goblin Worker, the sledgehammer hit a MAJOR challenge soon after setting about the task in hand. The only way through with a stronger attack needed Mr Developer’s authorisation. This meant, in effect, I had to wake a very grumpy team boss who’d turned the emails off.
I was reminded of this incident through a recently found article in which the writer explains how he’d been unnecessarily harsh in his attitude towards someone who’d approached him. Long story short, it got me thinking about the gamut of attitudes I’ve been on the receiving end of. From the humbling experience of being a Guest of Honour at a couple’s wedding because they’d managed to salvage their business and buy a home… to being on the receiving end of Mr Developer’s vocal boxing. He’d underutilised his assets and thought he’d kick off with a predictably un-creative and without reason **** *FF! Following through with a nasty knee-jerk Rot in the Ninth Circle of Hell!
As my tale is the in the tradition of complicated real life, after I walked away there was no Karma. Mr Developer didn’t fail miserably.
I chose to lose a client and for some time he scrabbled like a drowning rat in sinking mud, but…. eventually found a raft (of sorts). We both meant business; we just dealt with it differently.
Business As Normal…
Small firms are on the whole still feeling austerity chomping at their heels from which many are facing heavy additional burdens. Consequently, doing the bare minimum to get the job done means ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ decisions aren’t always considered, and we’re seeing a distinctive two-camp pattern of those who acknowledge that changes continually happen, therefore they have or are prepared to adapt….. and, those who prefer to put their head in the sand.
Notice any parallels with the endless financial headlines?
For example, LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate), the wholesale market interest rate for lending between lenders (banks), once perceived as a reliable benchmark, was recently subject to claims of manipulation. Did it adapt or put its head in the sand? Whichever, it’s now being forced to look at change.
Base Rate has current ‘forward guidance’ giving that, providing unemployment remains above 7%, interest rates will not go above the four year static 0.5%. When the MPC (Monetary Policy Committee) make their decisions for setting the Base Rate (BoEBR) to meet inflation rate targets, the objective, based on variables, is to maintain price stability whilst supporting the Chancellor’s objective – In essence to strike a balance between keeping inflation down, yet not pushing up interest rates higher than would be healthy for inflationary pressure. Theoretically, interest rates could stay at the norm 0.5% for the next few years. Dependent on how they are interpreted, dependant on which numbers are used, the shift around could be viewed as ignoring the facts or being ‘forced’ into change.
This Interest rate, for short term money lending by the Bank of England to commercial financial institutions, (who in turn set their own interest rates for their borrowers and savers), was changed between 1997 and 2005 on 30 occasions - 26 came in the form of quarter-point changes in either direction, and the rest were half-point changes - from 1971 to 2013, the average rate of interest was 8.19%…. and, with a potential forced change for mortgage lenders, (consequence of EU rulings); which could have mortgage lenders having to tell borrowers ‘the maximum interest rate they have charged during the past two decades’, this APR could arguably contribute to already confusing information, with both lenders and borrowers wanting to bury their heads as preferable option to advertised loans and their Klingonesque small print : ‘Interest rate of a maximum of a charged during past two decades’.
What could curb all this confusion? What could possibly give those in business an opening to consider the ramifications of not considering? ….got me to thinking about the derogatory term: Normal for Norfolk.
For any not familiar with this reference to a county, it’s used when describing an action (or less sensitively an individual) which is seen as so ridiculous it could only have been born as a result of inbreeding; the implication being it’s a stupid action. Scratch away at the letters (distraction technique for mounting paperwork) and it takes only the removal of a few consonants before a couple of useful phrases alight.
The new normal (following 2007-2008) for business could utilise these phrases as clarity from many a powerful body: this is ‘Normal for No Folk’ or this is ‘Normal for Folk’. ‘They’ (those who issue the statements) should be able to see clearly each time, by the response they get, that we (those the statements apply to) understand what it is we’re being told. The phrases could help us to understand whether something is a long or short term expectation, or acceptable or unacceptable situation - We’d be able to clarify whether they do or don’t know what they’re doing. They could go about their business realising what they perceive as ‘Normal for Folk’ is anything but normal…. and we could go about ours, understanding ‘Normal for No Folk’ is anything but normal.